Search:

Leadership Motivation Lead by example Leadership Course Self improvement success

9/11 Coincidences (Part Four)

Motivate to Success
Motivate to Success Motivate to Success
Motivate to Success

9/11 Coincidences (Part Four)----------------------------The sites displayed at the end of each video in my 9/11 Coincidences series are provided so that people have a place to start their investigations. These sites are not displayed as a means of backing up any one point of view. And those sites may not necessarily be of the opinion that we should question whether a plane actually hit the Pentagon. The websites are provided so that people will view all sides of the story and then come to their own conclusions. Unlike some other videos on 9/11, the 9/11 Coincidences series does not promote the no-planes theory. If it did then you'd expect to see the subject covered in some detail. Instead all you see on the subject is the 1:13 seconds here in Part 4 that points out the fact that the government has not released an image showing the plane that hit the Pentagon. And in Part 10 a brief mention is made about the size of the Pentagon hole. This series of videos does not try to push any particular theory. It merely lays out the facts and points out the anomalies, while providing links to further info concerning what is being said about all those anomalies. This particular aspect of 9/11 is a very hot potato, and whether you think it is a red-herring or not, it deserves to be discussed instead of being swept under the carpet. It seems to me that ignoring the subject is the cowardly thing to do if you want to do a documentary that encourages people to look at all of the facts. That's why I have touched on the subject here, albeit very briefly, so that people can at least think about it, and then go to sites like "WhatReallyHappened" and "911InPlaneSite" and other sites, to decide for themselves. That's the fair way to do it. If I had ignored the Pentagon aspect of 9/11 then many people would accuse me of being some kind of shill. It is a very tight and thin rope that you have to walk when expressing your thoughts on the whole 9/11 subject. And the more facts you bring up, the greater the chance of upsetting someone because they don't agree that those particular facts have any relevance. The purpose of Part 4 is to briefly say :"Look, there are some anomalies that raise questions about whether a Boeing jet really did hit the Pentagon. It is not by any means conclusive but here are a couple of facts supporting that line of inquiry... Now go and do some investigations for yourself, and here's a couple of sites that you might find useful for further opinions on this topic..."NufffRespect

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am
Author: NufffRespect

Length: 31:13
Rating: 4.61
Views: 861170

Tags: 9-11  9/11  911  alex  bombs  coincidences  collapse  explosions  inside  job  jones  larry  silverstein  wtc  wtc1  wtc2  wtc7  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

tuor1984 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
What if it's overcast?
earic23 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
conspiracy,,, sure, inside job,, sure, faces in smoke,,, shut the fuck up. take a look at any cloud on any given day and you can make yourself believe it looks like a face.
dan917x (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
If you have read the commission report you would know that WTC7 isn't even mentioned. Also the fact that a Pakistani official wired $100,000 to one of the hijackers Muhammad Atta had a meeting with the U.S. government on September 10th 2001. WATCH PRESS FOR TRUTH FOR ALL THE DOUBTERS OUT THERE!
xXshebaXx (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
OMG it DOES!!!
BoiledEggFace (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
what is that tune in the back ground?
feedbacksol (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
Fallout , hows you handling your homosexuality now that you've come out of the closet?? You still watching them wrestling vids of muscular men aggressively fondling each other?? Anyway, fallout .. You seem to take it personal nobody buys into your bullshit .. Now you act like your some kind of engineer whiz.. if so derive the conservation of momentum formula. as well as maxwell's equations.. being you clai to be so smart. PFFT.
feedbacksol (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
new wtc 7 video out nov 1 2008.. debunks the claim mark roberts and traitor debunker idiot fuks say took 18 seconds to collapse .. 7 seconds it took.. have a look and pass it around watch?v=3ujWitEr-Ww
stevie87 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
0:36Look at the edge of the black smoke. Looks like the face that was seen on the WTC tower.
slumsattack (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
for more true videos go on my channel
taxed2debt (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
I made a point Retard,How does a 100 story structure(WTC 7) come falling down without being hit by a plane?Is posting your irrelevant ranting replace that blowup doll of Bush in your closet?Yea,Im sure you read the 911 report.Go back to your video games,little boy.

Profesionalmuslim Blog | Profesionalmuslim Self-Confidence | Profesionalmuslim Management

Motivate to Success © 2007 All Rights Reserved.