|
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
to ebola23410: Stop with the just-so-stories such as "Design is not the beginning but an endpoint from random mutations and selection pressure caused by enviroment and sexual pressure." These are empty words that are not supported by the empirical evidence. Darwinism/Evil-ution never had a start & never happened from a supposed simple cell that popped into existence & then transmuted into everything that ever lived. This is a mythical event that is unfalsifiable. Stop hijacking evidence for EVO
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
MrPingPongBrain1000 "UK resident & bemused by creationism ...In basic terms the second law of thermodynamics is that "in a closed system, all things tend towards entropy". Creationists misinterpret the 2nd law to say that things invariably progress from order to disorder. Ignoring the key part of the rule "A CLOSED SYSTEM". They neglect the fact that life is not a closed system. We are powered by the sun."MORON! Read ldolphin . org/mystery/SLoT applies to open & closed & doesn't help!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
BMSRoyBasch "..the essence of faith is, by definition, the belief in something with no logical proof. ..taking every parable in the Bible as literal truth also a bit irrational ..?"Biblical faith is in God's word which is logical, testable, & trustworthy. Darwinism is a believe is a fairy tale about human notions of brainless purposeless mother nature making life from chemicals & transmuting it into everything else.Parables are not literal! Only the Parable teller can decipher its meaning.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
BMSRoyBasch"People who are CONVINCED of evolution examine the evidence critically & decide for themselves if this is a solid theory or not. Is this irrational,ignorance,prideful or arrogant?"All of the above & a Lie!There is no evidence to critically analyse for Darwinism/EVO. It never had a start & never happened from pond scum to you. Mythical Magical Brainless Materialistic Naturalism did not cause the genesis of a supposed simple cell or to transmute it into everything that ever lived.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
This is all idle gibberish. Do you have a point. Saint Augustine does not speak for me, God, or replace the Bible.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
ebbola23410 "Then enlighten me. How is it posssible that the Israelite population went from seventy (Ex.1:5) to several million (over 600,000 adult males) in just a few generations! (Numbers 1:45-46 )."What is a generation now versus then? How large were families then versus now? How many child bearing years then versus now? How many wives, mistresses then versus now? It's not unreasonable at all. Read below for the details.ldolphin . org/alanm/abrexo . html
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
You have been told not to respond to my comments since all you do is post lies & unintelligent flippant responses. You are ignorant of Abiogenesis, formerly known as Spontaneous Generation, which is the clever deception by Thomas Huxley to help poor boy Darwin & his vacuous tautologies & lame stories that hand wave the falsifying evidence away. The so-called common ancestor of all at the root of the evolutionary tree of live is your supposed simple cell that popped into existence naturaly.duh
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
wikdreans "u invoke God unnecessarily, & quote from any obsolete or untrustworthy sources that fits your argument, & nothing from a peer-reviewed, recognized scientific journal."Any evolutionary material from so-called scientists are meaningless, regardless of a peer review. Darwin's peers rejected Darwinism/Evil-ution.You are the one posting irrelevant material such as the Urey-Miller failed experiment, which was fraudulent and not naturalistic. You rant about old disproved icons of Evo.
Renfield37 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
ive been nothing but correct, but all you had to do was admit your failure anyway
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
2 of 2It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. |
