|
honchunfung (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
CatRem: Kempff is definitely for Beethoven. I am pretty sure. But "Horowitz maybe for Mozart" is the most stupid comment i've ever seen on youtube. His Mozart sucks. His Suhubert wasn't the best either. He is for Chopin and Liszt and Russian composers generally.
red425 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
This piece best displays Kempff's extremely lyrical playing. The slower passages give him room for rubatic interpretation, at which he excels.
mynameisyibble (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
I think Kempff is the only pianist we have recordings of that really captures the urgency of this piece...
klausknulp (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
yes - agree 100%
drake41290 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
hell no BEETHOVEN is
CatRem (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
I think Kempf definitely for Beethoven, Horowitz maybe for Mozart, Schubert etc.
josemiguel95 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
LOL "Grandpa"!!!! hahahaha
americanblues05 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
What about McCartney, Lennon, Clapton? think about it
bandong1234567890 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
no..........horowitz is
klausknulp (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
wilhelm kempff probably had been the most musical player ever |
