|
northwestmike (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
This seems like a pretty stupid thing for ugly fat chicks to be upset about. Since the beginning of photography over 100 years ago, people have always wanted to look good in pictures. People have always insisted in being photographed in nice clothes, with proper lighting, and from the best angle. None of that helps fat chicks so they are destined to complain.
jaenusa (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
Her body is good enough for me without photoshop!
rejman (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
Hot as heLL
Sir0wnzAl0t (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
photos have to be retouched man.... it's amazing to see hotter pics of women.
kleppyknox (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
yea really- who cares? its just a picture.
thefrankie5 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
Check out my Profile to get loads and loads of Photoshop tutorials, with things like how to change day into night and how to change body parts !!!Check it out and become a photoshop Genius !!!!!!
IXIMathiasIXI (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
I don't have anything against retouching...
metalhead9669 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
she is good looking with out it
Marlboro1337 (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
it is because of the human obsession with remaining attractive to the opposite sex. the exact trends change but some of the more biological, physical traits that we find attractive stay the same. the media takes advantage of this obsession (which has existed for thousands of years) and plays it into making us strive for something and encourage us to be more vigorous consumers.
wcorwcor (January 1, 1970 at 7:29 am)
Yea I like it... One insight is if you see a person reading this stuff, does that not give you the tell of person anyway. What should be banned is the art of no taste. |